Showing posts with label New York Times. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New York Times. Show all posts

Thursday, July 17, 2008

A Modest Proposal

(My apologies to Jonathan Swift.)

With the economy in the toilet, banks failing, soldiers dying in Afghanistan (remember the War on Terror front that  we were "winning?"), and Bush doing the happy dance toward war in Iran I try to operate under the assumption that it can't get any worse.

But when it comes to Dubya's administration, never say never.

Yesterday I read about the White House's current proposal for recipients of aid under federal health programs. Needless to say this plan is not doing much to make me a latter-day convert to the Bush way. One part of it requires hospitals, etc. to certify that they won't refuse to hire someone (nurses, etc.) who object to abortion and even some kinds of birth control. WTF?

The reason for this? So federal money isn't “support[ing] morally coercive or discriminatory practices or policies in violation of federal law." Dear Barbara.


The New York Times has more on the whole shebang, but this part seems especially pertinent to me:

The proposal defines abortion as follows: “any of the various procedures — including the prescription, dispensing and administration of any drug or the performance of any procedure or any other action — that results in the termination of the life of a human being in utero between conception and natural birth, whether before or after implantation.”

Mary Jane Gallagher, president of the National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association, which represents providers, said, “The proposed definition of abortion is so broad that it would cover many types of birth control, including oral contraceptives and emergency contraception.”

While I really am trying to control my "outrage" over things these days, this just seems like a last ditch effort at extremism when it comes to women and their bodies. One, which unfortunately, will have the most detrimental effect on low income women. You know, the ones that need assistance with birth control the most because they can least afford the expense of another child or a child period?

My question remains to all of these anti-abortion, anti-birth control people—What happens once the kids are born? Are you going to provide for them then, emotionally and financially? If you truly believe life is sacred, doesn't that extend to their life outside of the womb?

If someone could answer that one for me, I think one of the great mysteries of the universe would have been solved.

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

DEM Smackdown

In this corner we have the former governor of New Mexico, former U.S. Representative, lawyer, Roman Catholic, and possessor of a MAGNIFICENT beard, William Blaine Richardson III.

And in this corner, the former presidential campaign strategist, host of CNN's now-defunct Crossfire, lover of GOP dames, the Rajun' Cajun, James Carville.

Now, why you may ask are these two men going at it? Aren't democrats supposed to be lovers, not fighters?

Richardson endorsed Obama earlier this week rather than Clinton, even though Bill
Clinton appointed him to two senior positions in his presidential cabinet. Coupled with the fact that Richardson is one of the party's more prominent Hispanics, a group that both Clinton and Obama are courting ferociously, and let's just say you might have some hurt feelings coming from the Clinton camp.

But how does 'ole Carville figure into this exactly? He is a friend of the Clinton's and the NY Times does describe him as an "advisor" to their camp (whatever that means—can I consider Clinton and Stacy from TLC's What Not to Wear as my advisors, because god knows I try to adhere to their advice to avoid a tapered pant leg.)

Carville said it was an "act of betrayal," as well as this (in reference to Holy Week):
Mr. Richardson's endorsement came right around the anniversary of the day when Judas sold out for 30 pieces of silver, so I think the timing is appropriate, if ironic.

Methinks Carville's media star needed a bit of a polish?

Richardson for his part credited Obama's recent speech about race for solidifying his decision. 

In other news of testiness on the Clinton front, first daughter Chelsea gave the succinct smackdown to a questioner on the campus of Butler University. The person asked about did Monica Lewinsky hurt her mother's credibility. Chelsea's reply, "I do not think that is any of your business."